← Back to bills
This bill did not pass parliament7 Sept 2020

The bill was rejected or lapsed before becoming law.

🏛 House of Representatives3 readingsAmendments circulated

Norfolk Island Amendment (Supreme Court) 2020

✦ Plain-English Summary

Norfolk Island Amendment (Supreme Court) 2020

What it does

This bill changes how Norfolk Island's Supreme Court operates, particularly around where court sittings can happen and how judges get paid. Instead of the court being limited to specific arrangements, it now allows the Commonwealth to make flexible agreements with any Australian state or territory to host court proceedings.

Why it matters

Norfolk Island is a small territory without enough legal infrastructure to run a full Supreme Court on its own, so this makes it easier and more practical for serious criminal and civil cases to be heard elsewhere in Australia. It removes bureaucratic barriers that were slowing down justice for Norfolk Island residents.

Key details

  • Judge pay: Judges now get paid based on their salary in whichever other Australian court they also serve in (rather than a separate Norfolk Island salary)
  • Where court happens: The Commonwealth can now arrange for the Supreme Court to sit in any state or territory, not just limited options previously available
  • Commencement: The changes took effect the day after the bill received Royal Assent (became law)

Official Description

Amends the Norfolk Island Act 1979 to: make technical amendments to the provisions authorising off-island sittings of the Supreme Court of Norfolk Island to remove any doubt that the Supreme Court may exercise its criminal or civil jurisdiction in a state, in the absence of an arrangement between the Commonwealth and the state government or authority, where no powers, duties or functions are conferred or imposed upon a state officer; and clarify the basis under which travelling allowances are determined for judges of the Supreme Court.

Full bill PDF →APH page →

Audit History

Introduced

13 May 2020

Last updated on APH

10 Apr 2026

Outcome date

7 Sept 2020

Last checked by Crossbench

4 days ago

Full text indexed

4 days ago

🗳️

No formal division recorded

This bill passed by voice vote — parliament agreed without calling a formal count. A division is only recorded when a member explicitly requests one.

Constituent votes

Voting is closed — this bill has been decided by parliament.

No votes yet.

No votes were recorded for this bill.

🔒 Voting closed — this bill has been decided by parliament